A finding is only as useful as its basis.

One natural-gas engine or turbine on a common AC bus, evaluated with supplied baseline and proposal profiles. Applicable manufacturer operating points and conditions must be documented. The method does not interpolate, extrapolate or automatically derate an unprovided operating point.

Gas evidence separates pipeline delivery rate in MMBtu/hour from a finite allocation in MMBtu, both on a lower-heating-value basis. Pressure, fuel quality, protections and permitted operating periods also matter. This is not a diesel-tank model or a forecast of available runtime.

No gas-plus-battery combination, multiple units, export, startup, islanding, automatic dispatch, optimization, gas-network hydraulics or replenishment scheduling. A whole-window allocation failure does not invent a crossing time.

One grid-connected site, one battery and one already-running No. 2-D petroleum diesel generator, with one isolated closed-return fuel tank. The method checks supplied baseline and request profiles, applicable limits, finite-window energy and fuel, reserves and baseline protection.

Generator net output and external auxiliaries are constant within each modeled trajectory. Site-load and battery-profile changes use explicit aligned intervals. Applicable limits and fuel-consumption evidence must be supplied.

No export, startup, islanding, refueling, multiple batteries or generators, automatic dispatch, optimization or source-specific charging attribution. A supported finite window is not repeat-cycle capability, firm capacity or permission to operate.

A compatible power/resource evaluation can be accompanied by one IT heat boundary, one air-removal branch, zero or one single-phase liquid branch with ordered serial interfaces, and one documented common final heat-rejection stage. Mixed cooling accounts for both paths; liquid-cooled IT may still have residual air load.

Each stage requires evidenced capacity at the applicable conditions. Baseline and proposal use the same physical chain but may have different demands, capture fractions, conditions and applicable capacities. Parallel equipment is represented only through an independently reviewed net aggregate, not automatic addition of equipment ratings.

Cooling electricity, heat removal and applicable capacity are separate quantities. Native site-load profiles must reconcile cooling electricity without double counting. Generator and battery heat must be confirmed outside the assessed cooling and rejection boundaries; missing confirmation leaves the affected checks unresolved, while a known failure still produces Not supported. Without an established failure, unresolved required evidence leaves the overall finding Unknown. Observed heat transfer is not a capacity rating. Shared sink allocations, uncertainty, physical limits and protected service remain explicit.

Transport, flow, fluid and temperature compatibility require supporting evidence. Latent and condensation requirements need separate confirmation. Chilled-water air handling without IT liquid capture remains air-cooled IT; it is not evidence of liquid-cooled IT.

No generic immersion or two-phase support, arbitrary rear-door or loop-network model, hydraulic or computational-fluid-dynamics simulation, rack/chip-temperature guarantee, automatic plant optimization or unrestricted campus aggregation.