A supplied proposal
Evaluate the declared equipment arrangement, operating profiles, period and protected obligations against the applicable evidence.
Comparisons and portfolio review
Compare proposals on a clear basis.
Review compatible site proposals and the periods you supply. Keep their assumptions, constraints and evidence gaps visible before deciding which case needs further work.
Keep the basis of comparison visible.
Owners, operators, developers and diligence teams can review the same evidence. Comparisons keep compatible methods, boundaries and decision criteria together; unlike cases are not forced into one ranking.
Compatible cases
Compare compatible supplied cases and evaluation periods, show which assumptions changed and preserve ties. The reviewer still decides what to pursue.
A reviewable summary
Bring the included site findings, constraints, missing evidence and next review actions together. A summary does not add incompatible capacity figures into one total.
Ask what could change the conclusion.
A controlled what-if evaluates declared changes to assumptions while preserving the original observations. Each supplied period is assessed in full; Headroom does not search for an operating window, invent a plan or choose an optimal dispatch.
Where the documented method supports it, compatible cases can have explained diligence priorities. Ties and reviewer judgment stay visible; incompatible cases are not forced into one ranking. These priorities are not investment recommendations. The displayed portfolio example is an unranked summary with no combined MW total.
Site reports, comparison records, portfolio summaries and replayable evidence support scrutiny of the agreed assessment.
Evaluate the workflow before extending the relationship.
Start with a First Site Evaluation. Subsequent comparison and portfolio work can be scoped around compatible questions and authorized records.
Quarterly reporting is available under an annual agreement, priced per site according to the agreed scope. Pricing and terms are subject to written approval before work begins. No live integration, unattended self-service, customer deployment or production-readiness claim is made.
One site. One question. An agreed period.
First Site Evaluation
Start with a fit discussion by email. The paid assessment covers one site and one decision, with scope, quote, authorization and data handling agreed before records are shared.
Standard assessments: Written finding within five business days after scope is agreed and the required records are confirmed. Broader assessments, including coupled power-and-cooling work, follow the schedule agreed in the written quote.
Request a First Site Evaluation
Review the records checklist and who develops Headroom. No sensitive records are needed for the initial inquiry.
Read-only, export-based and analyst-assisted. Findings apply to a supplied proposal, defined period and supported method; they are not operating approval or guaranteed capacity. Public capacity examples are synthetic. Customer-site validation and qualified external engineering review remain outstanding. Method boundaries and verification